Todos os documentos legais estão disponíveis apenas em inglês, e somente a versão em inglês é juridicamente vinculante.
Traduzir com o Google Tradutorabre em uma nova guia; apenas para referênciaHow the ledger bundle format, the audit chain and the API are versioned, which changes can happen within a version and which need a new one, and why a bundle sealed today stays verifiable for good.
Last updated November 5, 2026.
| What | Current version |
|---|
Passe ações de agentes, hashes de conteúdo, checagens de API, DNS, webhooks, chamadas de LLM e commits git pela Intramedial. Receba um recibo assinado que todos verificam – sem confiar em nós.
| Where it is stated |
|---|
| Ledger bundle format | 1 | The Ledger bundles reference. A bundle in version 1 carries no version member; a later format version adds one |
| Audit chain entry | 1 | RFC 8785 canonical JSON, SHA-256, each entry linked to the hash of the previous one |
| Merkle tree over chain entries and ledger events | 1 | The Verifying reference |
| Export bundle | intramedial-export/1 | The manifest of every export |
| Signing key set | Published JWK set | /.well-known/ledger-bundles-keys.json |
| API | v1 | The path, /api/v1/ |
Offline verifier (@intramedial/verifier, command intramedial-verify) | 0.1.0 | The version of the package, published under the MIT licence |
In plain language: a bundle belongs to a format version, and that version never changes meaning. Old bundles keep verifying with the same steps, whatever we add later.
Within version 1, changes are additive only:
None of these affects verification. The signature covers every member present in the bundle, whatever it is called, so a verifier that canonicalizes the whole document, as the steps in Verifying records require, verifies bundles with members it has never seen. Software that reads the fields should ignore members it does not know.
Any change to how bundles or chain entries are canonicalized, to the hash function, to the signature scheme, or to the members every bundle must have, requires a new format version. Version 1 bundles stay verifiable for good: we will not reinterpret them, and verifiers must keep accepting them alongside any later version.
Before any bundle is sealed in a new format version, we will publish its description, support it in our verification libraries and on the /verify page, and announce it in the changelog. The move to post-quantum signatures, which we intend to make, described on Post-quantum status, is the change most likely to need one. No post-quantum signature is used in production today.
The API is versioned by its path. Within /api/v1/, changes are additive: new endpoints, new optional request fields and new response fields. A change that would break existing callers gets a new path prefix, and /api/v1/ keeps working alongside it for the notice period set out in Versioning and deprecation. There is no version header and no date-based versioning. The MCP tool list follows the same rule: a tool's published input and output schema changes only additively within a version.
We announce API changes in the changelog. Removing a paid feature is announced by email at least 30 days ahead, as the Terms of Service say.
The verification libraries follow semantic versioning. A new major version may drop support for an old runtime, but never for an old bundle format or an old published key: every library version verifies every bundle format version that existed when it was released. The verifier runs offline and has no dependency on Intramedial, so a bundle can be checked years later even if the service is gone. There is no fixed support window for library versions; the steps are simple enough that any current version, or your own code, will do.
Three things keep an old bundle verifiable without us:
1 bundle means the same thing in twenty years as it does today.Where an OpenTimestamps anchor has been confirmed for a bundle, the otsProof member lets you check, against the Bitcoin block it names, that the bundle's digest existed by then, without asking us. How anchors work, and what they do not show, is set out in the Record Practice Statement section 5.
For evidence that must outlast a possible future quantum computer, see Post-quantum status.
We update this page when a version changes. Questions: support@intramedial.com.
